As we dive into the 2025 NHL Draft class, it’s essential to evaluate prospects through the lens of today’s game, where size, while still a factor, is no longer the defining trait it once was. The modern NHL demands speed, skill, and intelligence at every position. However, physical benchmarks remain part of the projection process. With the average NHL player standing at 6’1.5″ and weighing 206 pounds—and the average NHL All-Star only slightly smaller—teams continue to value players who combine ability with a frame that can withstand the rigors of the pro game and the NHL playoffs.
Across the developmental pipeline, we see incremental size increases as players progress. The average player in junior leagues around the World is under both 6’0″ and 190-lbs, while NCAA Division I and AHL players trend closer to 6’0″ and a pound or two over 190-lbs. These averages serve as a reference—not a rule—but they do underscore how physical maturity and strength can influence draft positioning and development timelines.
In preparing this year’s draft preview, we prioritized hockey sense, compete level, and consistency in basic puck skills—traits that translate into dependability across all professional levels. We also assessed skating mechanics, situational awareness, and the ability to influence games without possession of the puck. Positional value and long-term upside factored heavily into our rankings, with players showing high-end potential being evaluated through a professional projection lens.
Ultimately, this guide is designed to provide NHL organizations with a clear, concise look at the players we believe are best equipped to adapt, grow, and succeed in the National League.
Samuel Doyon-Cataquiz (G, L, 6’2″, 187, Bishop Kearney Selects U18, 04/18/2007, Quinnipiac)
Samuel Doyon-Cataquiz is a competitive, poised goaltender with above-average athleticism, strong technical foundation, and consistent mental composure. At 6’1.5″ and 187 pounds, he’s slightly under the current NHL size trend for goaltenders but makes up for it with elite compete, smart reads, and strong edge control. Over four starts at the 2024 USA Hockey U18 National Tournament, he posted a .950 SV% and 1.23 GAA, facing 101 shots across 243 minutes. He was Bishop Kearney’s only goalie and played every minute, providing his team a legitimate chance to win in each game. His showing was among the best of any starter in the tournament, marked by calm structure and battle-tested execution.
Reasons to Draft:
Doyon-Cataquiz brings several projectable traits: he’s a technically sound butterfly goalie who stays tall in his stance and controls rebounds effectively. He plays square to the shooter, tracks well through traffic, and manages chaos around the net with balance and poise. His lateral movement is sharp due to powerful edgework, and he maintains clean mechanics on recovery pushes. He challenges outside shots, reads developing plays with anticipation, and doesn’t overcommit when reacting to passes. He’s shown confidence handling pucks behind the net and demonstrated excellent situational awareness when breaking up float-in dump-ins to aid retrievals. His high-effort, high-compete identity consistently showed up when forced to make secondary or desperation saves. He’s already committed to Quinnipiac and has the mental maturity and composure to succeed in a strong NCAA program.
Reasons Not to Draft:
While he tracks well on initial shots, there are flashes of delayed recovery positioning on second or third chances. He can at times be slow to reset, leaving small windows open on extended sequences. His size, while adequate, is not prototypical for modern NHL goaltenders, and he does not have the same net coverage or glove reach as 6’4″+ prospects. Additionally, while his rebound control is generally strong, he occasionally defaults to catching or smothering when a directed deflection or stick steer would maintain better tempo. His mechanics, while tight, can also become slightly rigid under heavy pressure, slowing his explosive lateral transitions. These are fixable, but will require targeted development at the NCAA level.
Projection:
Doyon-Cataquiz projects as a potential NCAA starter with NHL backup upside. His combination of intelligence, compete, and technical discipline could allow him to develop into a low-maintenance, dependable goaltender who can stabilize games and give his team a chance to win. If he continues to progress physically and sharpens his recovery reads, he could eventually challenge for an NHL role.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free Agent Watch.
His mental approach, athletic base, and foundational habits make him a bet worth taking despite being slightly undersized. If his college development curve trends positively, he could prove to be strong organizational depth with NHL spot-start potential.
Brent Solomon (RW, R, 6’0″, 173, Champlin Park, 01/02/2007, Wisconsin)
Brent Solomon is a dynamic right-shot winger who combines speed, shot volume, and offensive instincts to create pressure and production in the offensive zone. At just under 6’0″ and 173 pounds, he’s below average NHL size but fits the current mold of mobile, skilled wingers with finishing ability. Solomon played in all situations for Champlin Park, led the team offensively, and averaged over two points per game in Minnesota High School play during his draft year. His toolkit includes a smooth skating stride, sharp puck skills, and a deceptive shot release, and he projects as an aggressive shot-first winger with top-six upside if he can round out his game at the NCAA level.
Reasons to Draft:
Solomon’s ability to carry speed through the neutral zone and create off the rush stands out. He gets to top speed quickly, manages pucks effectively at pace, and shows a knack for separating from defenders using agility and strong edge control. He frequently pushes play inside the dots and creates chances through quick hands and a powerful, accurate shot with a rapid release. He has proven he can beat goalies from bad angles and adjust his shooting lanes around defenders and screens. Solomon plays with confidence, wants the puck on his stick in scoring areas, and shows good spatial awareness to draw coverage and then move pucks into soft areas. He has been a volume shooter who consistently generates 8–10 shot attempts per game and has shown signs of improving decision-making under pressure. His performance on the power play—where he shifts shooting angles and manipulates defenders—is a major strength.
Reasons Not to Draft:
While Solomon plays a high-skill offensive game, his decision-making with the puck under pressure needs refinement. He can hold onto the puck too long, miss passing options, or force low-percentage shots into traffic when a better play exists. His puck distribution in transition and on the power play remains average, and his pass volume and pre-shot passing metrics would likely fall below other top offensive peers in higher levels of play. He was also not consistently engaged without the puck, and his off-puck defensive reads—especially tracking back and wall support—will need to tighten considerably to stay in a lineup at the NCAA or pro level. Physically, he will need to add weight and strength to play through contact more effectively. His play against stronger competition will need to be evaluated further once he transitions out of Minnesota high school hockey.
Projection:
Solomon projects as a middle-six scoring winger with potential power play utility if he can clean up his decision-making and off-puck awareness. He has clear translatable NHL attributes—speed, shot, and offensive zone creation—but will need to evolve into a more complete player at Wisconsin. The tools are present for a breakout at the NCAA level if his game matures with structure and coaching.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free Agent. Solomon’s scoring instincts, mobility, and shot mechanics give him long-term upside, and if his transition to higher levels is smooth, he could outperform his draft peers. The risk is mitigated by his clear strengths in pace and shot creation, making him a worthwhile developmental pick.
Dakoda Rheaume-Mullen (D, L, 6’0″, 181, Michigan, 12/18/2006, Michigan)
Dakoda Rheaume-Mullen is a poised, mobile two-way defenseman skating in a depth role with the University of Michigan in his first NCAA season. He has below average size for an NHL blueliner, but his efficient skating stride, puck retrieval timing, and defensive reliability give him a foundation to build from. Rheaume-Mullen was trusted with even-strength minutes on a competitive Michigan roster but saw limited usage on special teams. His game is defined by predictability and responsibility—not flash—but he displays maturity and structure in his approach, making few glaring mistakes and managing his role with consistency.
Reasons to Draft:
Rheaume-Mullen is a responsible defender who can eat bottom-pairing minutes in structured systems. He consistently wins puck battles at a 54% clip and makes a high rate of accurate passes (88%), often choosing simple, high-percentage outlets to exit the zone cleanly. He showed sound puck retrieval skills and blocked nearly one shot per game, signaling his willingness to support in the defensive zone. His footwork and stick positioning allow him to keep plays in front of him and break up entries without overcommitting. His low giveaway total (3.4 per game) relative to his touches shows care in puck management. While not dynamic offensively, his calm puck movement and spatial awareness suggest he can function as a reliable puck mover under pressure. He projects as a low-risk, system-fitting defender who won’t beat himself.
Reasons Not to Draft:
Rheaume-Mullen’s limited size (5’11.75″, 178 lbs) and lack of physicality (just 0.18 hits per game) are concerning for a defenseman of his size at the NHL level, where average size and weight are trending larger and more physical. He rarely impacts the game offensively—averaging less than one shot on goal and generating virtually no high-danger scoring chances. His 0% scoring chance conversion and low shot volume point to limited offensive upside, and his pre-shot pass rate (0.64) is below average, indicating a lack of creativity or initiative in the attacking zone. He also saw minimal time on special teams, suggesting a narrower utility ceiling. His ceiling is likely that of a depth defenseman unless he adds strength and assertiveness in his game over time.
Projection:
Rheaume-Mullen projects as a potential bottom-pairing, defense-first option with penalty kill utility if he grows into his frame and adds more assertiveness. His path to the NHL likely hinges on becoming a highly reliable third-pair defender capable of playing structured minutes, moving pucks cleanly, and staying out of trouble.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free Agent.
While he plays a mature game with solid habits, his current lack of offensive value, physicality, and special teams utility limit his upside. If drafted, he will require a long runway to develop into an NHL option.
Tyler Russo (D, L, 6’1″, 186, Cushing Academy, 03/19/2007, Minnesota State)
Tyler Russo is a reliable, stay-at-home left-shot defenseman who plays a physical and positionally sound game. With slightly below average size for the National League level and a strong defensive conscience, Russo is effective in protecting his own end and simplifying play under pressure. At the USA Hockey National Tournament, he was deployed heavily in defensive situations and was trusted with penalty kill minutes, finishing with an average TOI of nearly 16:00 per game and close to two minutes short-handed. His style is understated—focused on containment, puck support, and clean breakouts rather than offensive creation.
Reasons to Draft:
Russo’s game is built on defensive consistency. He wins puck battles at a 53% rate, uses a smart stick and timing to break up plays, and boasts a strong 93% pass completion rate, which reflects his simple, low-risk puck decisions. His defensive zone time (7:26 per game) and relatively low puck loss rate (2.0 GA/game) indicate discipline under pressure and a mature awareness of his limitations. His active stick, willingness to finish checks (1.67 hits per game), and responsible decision-making on zone exits—either with a clean pass or a smart chip—are qualities that can translate to higher levels, especially in a depth role. Russo’s steady presence and willingness to sacrifice his body (1.11 blocks/game) also speak to his team-first mentality.
Reasons Not to Draft:
At this point Russo brings little to no offensive threat at this stage. He averaged just 0.67 shots on goal per game and didn’t register a scoring chance or point during the national tournament. His lack of power play usage and extremely low pre-shot pass rate (1.0 PSP/game) further underscore his limited impact with the puck in the offensive zone. For a player at 6’0.75″, 186 lbs—close to average size at the NCAA level—he does not yet separate himself with elite skating, creativity, or puck play to suggest a high ceiling. Additionally, while his physicality and defensive play are strong at the prep level, it’s uncertain whether that translates against stronger, faster competition without added strength or pace.
Projection:
Russo profiles as a depth defenseman who could project to a bottom-pairing role at the college level and potentially beyond, provided his skating continues to improve and he develops more urgency with the puck. His strength lies in structure and simplicity, not dynamism.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free Agent.
While Russo has a solid defensive foundation and plays with maturity, his lack of offensive tools, special teams value, and unknown upside suggest he is best tracked as a potential NCAA defensive role player rather than invested in as an NHL draft pick. If he adds strength and mobility, he could earn late-blooming free-agent consideration down the line.
Boris Osipovich (C, L, 6’0″, 180, Metallurg Magnitogorsk, 09/10/2005)
Boris Osipovich is a cerebral, left-shot center playing in the VHL who relies on pace, positional awareness, and playmaking efficiency to create value down the middle. He plays a measured game with flashes of deception and poise in transition but lacks the physicality and consistency in puck battles to assert himself against older, more mature competition. At 6’0″, 170 pounds, he is underdeveloped physically by North American pro standards, but he is intelligent, composed, and quick to identify soft ice in the offensive zone.
Statistical Profile (2024/25 VHL Averages):
TOI: 13:32
PPT: 1:35 | SHT: 0:01
FO%: 45% (0.49 FO/game)
SOG: 1.59 on 2.9 shots/game
SC: 0.79 chances/game | SC%: 17%
C% (Puck Battles Won): 39%
Pass Completion: 86% | Pre-shot passes: 0.53
Takeaways vs Giveaways: 2.2 TA / 3.5 GA
Reasons to Draft:
Osipovich processes the game at a high level, managing possession responsibly in the offensive zone and completing passes at an 86% clip, indicating control under pressure. He’s involved in offensive play driving, averaging nearly 3 shot attempts per game and 0.79 scoring chances with a respectable 17% conversion rate. His ability to handle second-unit power play minutes at the VHL level and locate teammates through layers shows good offensive instincts. Despite being lightly used defensively, he posts more takeaways than giveaways and retrieves loose pucks consistently (0.71 PRS/game), which supports his value as a transition-forward. He projects as a system-reliable middle-six pivot with time and strength.
Reasons Not to Draft:
The most glaring concern is his lack of physical competitiveness. Osipovich wins just 39% of his puck battles, and at 170 pounds, he’s underweight for a center trying to succeed in North American pro hockey. His 45% faceoff win rate adds to the concern over his ability to handle the interior game. He gets hit more often than he delivers contact (0.59 H- vs 0.31 H+), reinforcing the need for more physical maturity and assertiveness. Additionally, his shot selection is questionable—too many blocked (0.78 SBL/game) or missed (0.58 S-) shots suggest predictability. He is also a near non-factor on the penalty kill, with virtually no short-handed time logged.
Projection:
Osipovich projects as a cerebral, possession-focused third-line center with second power play unit upside if he adds muscle and develops more edge to his game. His skating and vision are serviceable, but his development path is longer term.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free Agent.
Osipovich’s hockey sense, pace, and puck distribution are NHL traits, but his size, faceoff struggles, and lack of physicality limit his current impact. He should be tracked for late-round selection or prioritized for development camp invites, particularly if he commits to North America or plays a larger role in the KHL next season.
Lucas Beckman (G, L, 6’2″, 182, Baie-Comeau Drakkar, 08/23/2007)
Lucas Beckman is a poised, technically sound goaltender who delivers consistent results with strong lateral mobility, excellent rebound control, and smart puck-handling decisions. With a 2.65 GAA, .914 save percentage, and 4 shutouts in 52 games, Beckman has established himself as one of the QMJHL’s most reliable starters this season. He combines efficient crease movements with a calm demeanor that allows him to control tempo and settle his team. While his size is just below the modern NHL average for goalies, his technical refinement, composure under pressure, and ability to read play compensate effectively at the junior level.
Reasons to Draft:
Beckman displays a polished foundation in all core areas of modern goaltending: he’s square to shooters, absorbs pucks cleanly, and limits rebound chaos with tight body control. His glove hand is elite for this level, and he’s particularly strong on blocker-side saves against off-wing releases. He reads the game well, plays deep but recovers quickly, and has shown strong lateral mechanics—especially with his T-push recovery and ability to seal post-to-post. His puck-handling adds a layer of value, as he makes clean, confident plays outside the crease and transitions pucks to his defense efficiently. Beckman’s calm under pressure, ability to steal games, and track record of strong starts in high-leverage QMJHL games make him one of the more NHL-ready goaltenders in this class from a technical standpoint.
Reasons Not to Draft:
Beckman’s size (6’1.5″) is under the NHL average for goaltenders (6’3″), and while not disqualifying, it may limit his margin for error when reacting to screens or high-slot deflections. He plays deep in the net, which suits his style but gives shooters extra space to pick corners, particularly on perimeter looks. While he recovers well, his explosiveness from down-low positions could improve—adding more core strength and lower-body pop will be essential. Additionally, while his confidence is a strength, he can overcommit to puck-handling sequences or swat at long-distance dump-ins instead of controlling them cleanly. To maximize his upside, Beckman must refine how he challenges shooters and develop quicker post integrations under duress.
Projection:
If he continues on his current trajectory and improves his explosiveness and post integration timing, Beckman projects as a future NHL backup with spot starter upside. His strong foundation, mental toughness, and ability to manage games give him a chance to play pro hockey at a high level.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free Agent.
Beckman’s poise, puck-tracking, and control offer significant upside if paired with a development path that enhances strength and athletic explosiveness. He’s a candidate to outperform draft position due to his consistency and mature approach.
Carl Axelsson (G, L, 6’3″, 179, Austin Bruins, 11/21/2006)
Carl Axelsson is a tall, composed Swedish-born goaltender who combines size with sound technical habits and a calm crease presence. He served as Team Sweden’s starter at international events and was the go-to netminder for Austin in the NAHL this season. His post-to-post movement is sound, and he has a controlled butterfly with the ability to seal the ice on low plays effectively. His rebound control and tracking are strong at this level, and he demonstrates good awareness through frequent shoulder checks and zone scans. Despite limited raw explosiveness in some movements, Axelsson’s compact mechanics and ability to set his feet early put him in favorable positions to make clean saves.
Reasons to Draft:
Axelsson has pro-level size and a methodical, structured game. He plays at the top of his crease and looks comfortable squaring up shooters, particularly on set plays. His ability to control rebounds—especially chest-absorbed shots and blocker deflections—is a strength. He’s comfortable in traffic and holds his seal well on lateral net-front scrambles. His compact stance helps minimize net exposure despite his tall frame, and he rarely overreacts to initial shots. Footwork is clean in tight, especially for a taller goaltender, and he has shown maturity beyond his years when facing pressure. His ability to battle through second and third chances and make composed saves when out of position is noteworthy.
Reasons Not to Draft:
Axelsson’s lateral quickness and post-to-post recovery are inconsistent. He’s prone to opening up on east-west rush plays or when reacting to lateral passes, leaving space under the arms or through the legs. On partial breakaways or quick lateral movements, he can overcommit or lose compactness, which has been exposed against top-tier opponents. His stick work is passive; activating puck protection more on pad saves would improve his rebound control. At 179 lbs, his frame still needs to fill out, which could help stabilize some of the delayed lateral transitions and explosive pushes. While poised, he occasionally defaults to conservative depth, allowing shooters more net than necessary.
Projection:
Axelsson projects as a long-term development goalie with potential NHL backup upside. If he improves his east-west transitions, sharpens post play on the move, and gains muscle mass, he has the frame and structure to push for a pro role down the line.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free Agent.
Axelsson is a project goaltender with an NHL-caliber foundation of size, composure, and technical habits. With refinement in mobility and more assertive crease management, he has the tools to become a valuable organizational depth piece and possible NHL backup.
Kam Hendrickson (G, R, 6’0″, 171, Waterloo Black Hawks, 01/09/2006, Connecticut)
Kam Hendrickson is a compact, right-catching goaltender who plays a technically refined and athletic game built on footwork, timing, and composure. His foundation stems from a narrow, upright stance that allows him to generate fluid movement laterally and quickly set his feet. Hendrickson consistently plays near the top of his crease to maximize his coverage, compensating for an average frame by using his angles intelligently. He tracks the puck well, shows confidence in high-pressure situations, and controls rebounds efficiently when properly set.
Reasons to Draft:
Hendrickson’s footwork, tracking ability, and rebound control are advanced relative to his age. His ability to seal the ice and remain composed on low plays while maintaining a tight, mobile reverse-edge control makes him dependable down low. He has elite pacing for a goalie his size—rarely overcommitting, and making calculated depth adjustments depending on rush pressure or sustained zone time. His use of backside looks and stance variation helps maintain vision through traffic, and he displays above-average situational awareness when facing deflections or secondary plays. His competitiveness and calmness were evident throughout the USHL season and at various national events, where he helped his team remain in games with consistent play.
Reasons Not to Draft:
At just over 6’0″ and 171 pounds, Hendrickson is undersized by modern NHL standards, especially when the average NHL goalie is 6’3″ and 210+. While he plays with composure and positioning to compensate, he can struggle with pucks elevated outside his body frame—particularly on glove/blocker side rushes or scrambles where vertical extension is required. His backside regain occasionally breaks down under fast east-west pressure, creating small windows for skilled opponents to exploit. He would benefit from improved zone scanning and anticipation reads, as shoulder checks are sporadic and limit his ability to pre-load for lateral plays. Continued physical development and strength gain will also be necessary to improve his explosiveness and puck-handling reach.
Projection:
Hendrickson projects as a long-term NCAA starter with the potential to become a professional goalie if he adds strength, improves high-shot coverage, and maintains his technical edge. His tracking, rebound control, and poise give him a strong foundation to build upon in a structured college environment.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free agent.
While undersized, Hendrickson has a refined base, calm demeanor, and enough athleticism to warrant investment. If he can develop his upper-net coverage and sharpen backside recoveries, he has the potential to become a capable depth option at the pro level.
Patrik Kerkola (G, L, 6’3″, 194, KalPa U20, 03/29/2007)
Patrik Kerkola is an agile, technically composed goaltender who plays with balance, poise, and above-average positional instincts. Despite being listed at 6’2.75″, he is frequently described as playing like a smaller goaltender due to his economy of movement and lateral speed. Kerkola impressed this season with KalPa’s U20 team and on the international stage at the Hlinka-Gretzky Cup, where he held a .912 SV% across three appearances despite facing high shot volume and challenging game states.
Reasons to Draft:
Kerkola’s game is built around sound technique, excellent tracking, and quick post-to-post movements. He maintains solid crease depth, often playing at the top of his crease to cut angles and square up to shooters. His glove hand is a legitimate strength, both in terms of reaction speed and hand placement, which allowed him to rob several quality scoring chances cleanly. He processes transition threats well and rarely panics, even under high pressure, using quiet feet and steady posture to remain in control. His performance at the Hlinka-Gretzky Cup highlighted his calm demeanor against elite peers, showcasing poise and focus despite defensive breakdowns in front of him.
Reasons Not to Draft:
While listed at nearly 6’3″, Kerkola plays smaller than his measurements suggest. He tends to default to deeper positioning in certain scenarios—particularly against lateral puck movement—relying more on reflexes than proactive positioning. He was beaten five-hole twice against the U.S., both from broken plays and screens, and showed occasional difficulty sealing his stance under quick redirections. While his hands and feet are quick, he can improve on sealing low and recovering to his posts under scramble conditions. He will need to adjust to North American shot types and traffic patterns, and a year or more of physical development will be necessary to maximize his frame’s impact in net.
Projection:
Kerkola projects as a long-term developmental goaltender with backup upside if his technical game and positioning continue to improve. His calm, structured style fits well with pro coaching environments, particularly if he gains confidence in playing larger in his crease and improving low-net coverage under traffic.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free agent.
Kerkola offers international pedigree, quick hands, and competitive poise. If he continues his current development path and adapts to North American systems, he could eventually challenge for a role as an AHL starter with NHL recall upside.
Nicolas Whitehead (C, L, 5’10”, 159, Ottawa 67s, 02/11/2007)
Nicolas Whitehead is a high-compete, undersized center with high-end speed, a quick stick, and positional awareness in all three zones. Logging nearly 15 minutes per game for Ottawa as a 17-year-old, including regular power play deployment, he made a consistent impact despite a slight frame that falls below the average size for OHL and NHL centers. Whitehead’s ability to create offense through pace, retrievals, and puck movement was on display throughout the season, though his physical limitations remain a critical consideration at the next level.
Reasons to Draft:
Whitehead plays with pace and purpose. He pushes play through the middle of the ice and shows strong habits in the offensive zone—averaging 2.7 shot attempts per game and generating 1.37 scoring chances per night. His pass completion rate (87%) is strong for a player who looks to make plays under pressure, and he supports the puck well both on the power play and in the cycle. Despite his size, he’s involved in puck battles (11 per game) and has strong anticipation, as seen in his takeaway-to-giveaway ratio (3.6 TA to 3.9 GA) and his puck retrievals after shots (1.54 per game). His faceoff usage (9 draws per game) and 44% win rate indicate that coaches trust him in key moments, and he should improve on draws as he physically matures. Whitehead’s IQ and pace-driven game give him tools that can translate if he continues to develop physically.
Reasons Not to Draft:
At 5’9.5″ and 159 lbs, Whitehead is undersized even by junior standards, and it shows in contested situations. He wins 42% of puck battles, and although he shows courage on retrievals, he is frequently outmuscled and lacks separation strength in one-on-one situations. He averages only 0.21 hits per game and 0.3 blocked shots per game — a limited physical presence in the defensive game. His low short-handed time (0:05 per game) and heavier reliance on offensive deployment (7:17 offensive zone TOI vs 5:46 defensive) reflect a player whose impact is currently one-sided. Additionally, his 9% scoring chance conversion rate shows that while he generates chances, he lacks finishing strength and deception or may struggle against stronger goaltending. Without significant improvements in strength and pace through contact, he may plateau at higher levels.
Projection:
Whitehead projects as a long-term development forward who could slot into a depth role if he adds strength and continues refining his off-puck defensive details. His puck movement, and pace give him a foundation, but his projection will remain limited unless he adds physical layers and improves his efficiency in small-area battles.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free Agent.
Whitehead’s hockey sense and puck skills merit investment, particularly for a team with a strong development pipeline. However, without physical gains and increased two-way versatility, he faces a steep path to becoming a contributing NHL player.
Chase Jette (RW, R, 5’10”, 174, Waterloo Black Hawks, 04/09/2007, Wisconsin)
Chase Jette is a competitive, pace-driven right wing with strong situational usage and versatile responsibility. At just under 5’10” and 174 pounds, he’s slightly undersized for the USHL average but compensates with quickness, puck pursuit, and offensive instincts. He averaged over 14 minutes per game this season and contributed on both special teams, indicating trust from his coaching staff.
Reasons to Draft:
Jette’s offensive game is active and opportunistic. He averaged 3 shot attempts and 1.77 scoring chances per game, converting on 12% of his high-danger looks. He’s capable of creating space with lateral movement and owns a deceptive release off the rush. Jette was involved in 11 puck battles per night and won 47% of them, a solid number considering his size. His 82% pass completion rate is slightly below top-tier playmakers but reflects an ability to move pucks under pressure. His takeaways (3.5) and loose puck recoveries (1.65) show a willingness to engage defensively, especially when factoring in over a minute of short-handed time per game. He also won 58% of the 2.4 faceoffs he took per game, offering added utility if asked to slide into the middle.
Reasons Not to Draft:
Jette’s physical and puck management metrics present concerns. He averaged just 0.6 hits per game and was on the receiving end of contact 0.63 times per game — a game built more on finesse than strength. He also turned the puck over 4.7 times per night and needs to improve puck security under heavy physical pressure. His pre-shot pass generation (0.69 PSP/game) is limited relative to his overall puck touches, suggesting he’s more of a straight-line shooter than a playmaker. At his current size, his projection to a depth-level middle-six is unclear unless he becomes more dynamic or significantly more responsible with possession.
Projection:
Jette projects as a developmental winger with potential middle-six upside. His pace, energy, and ability to produce at the junior level give him a chance to rise, but to move beyond a depth role, he’ll need to improve puck management, add strength, and diversify his offensive impact.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free Agent.
Jette’s versatility, offensive instincts, and motor make him worth a following closely, particularly for organizations confident in their ability to develop undersized forwards with pace. However, his ceiling is capped if physical and possession-based issues are not addressed.
Elliot Dube (C, L, 6’1″, 175, Saint John Sea Dogs, 03/15/2007)
Elliot Dube is a lean 6’1″ two-way center who was heavily utilized in all situations for Saint John during the 2024–25 season. Averaging over 16 minutes per night with significant roles on both the power play (1:00) and penalty kill (1:59), he operated as a matchup forward relied upon for responsible, structured minutes. His skating stride is fluid, and his defensive positioning is a strength, but he’ll need to add weight and offensive touch to elevate his projection.
Reasons to Draft:
Dube’s foundational traits are rooted in responsible two-way hockey. He was involved in 14 faceoffs per game and won 51%, a solid rate for a first-year draft-eligible center. He consistently handled 8 minutes per night in the defensive zone (PID), and his 1.82 puck recoveries per game following shots is a sign of strong anticipation and effort tracking loose pucks. With 3.7 shot attempts per game and 1.72 scoring chances created, he can generate offense, albeit modestly. His 0.54 blocked shots per game and 51% puck battle win rate over 14 attempts per game are further proof of an engaged, competitive player in his own end.
Reasons Not to Draft:
Despite his minutes and ice-time allocation, Dube’s offensive efficiency is limited. His scoring chance conversion rate (6%) is low, and he frequently defaults to straight-line attacks without a deceptive element. He also turned the puck over 4.9 times per game versus only 0.31 pre-shot passes per game, which reflects limited creativity and offensive awareness under pressure. His 79% pass completion rate is below the desirable mark for a center at the next level. Dube’s 170-pound frame currently lacks the strength to impose physically, evidenced by just 0.34 hits per game and 0.4 hits taken—he does not consistently initiate or absorb contact. Without growth in strength and puck skill, he may top out as a depth, shutdown type without an offensive gear.
Projection:
Dube projects as a depth two-way center at the pro level with potential penalty-kill value. His path to the NHL depends on physical development, offensive growth, and maintaining strong defensive detail against faster, more skilled opposition.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free Agent.
Dube’s positional intelligence, faceoff competency, and responsible play give him a chance to be a pro role player. However, his offensive ceiling and physical limitations create risk, and he will require significant development time.
Owen Griffin (C, R, 5’10”, 160, Oshawa Generals, 04/08/2007)
Owen Griffin is a smaller, right-shot center who logged significant minutes for the Oshawa Generals in all situations during the 2024–25 season. Averaging nearly 19 minutes per game—including 2:59 on the power play and 1:31 on the penalty kill—he was leaned on as a top-line driver despite his light frame. He plays with pace and touch and shows offensive creativity and puck management beyond his size limitations.
Reasons to Draft:
Griffin is a skilled play-driver with a high hockey IQ and strong puck control. He averaged 3.3 shot attempts and 2.0 scoring chances per game, converting at a respectable 19% clip. His 1.23 pre-shot passes and 90% passing accuracy are standout figures and indicative of his ability to facilitate offense without turning pucks over. He drew nearly half a penalty per game, showcasing his evasiveness and puck-possession style. Despite his size, Griffin competed in 13 puck battles per night and showed willingness in traffic. His ability to distribute, escape pressure, and contribute in all three zones made him an indispensable piece on a playoff-caliber OHL team.
Reasons Not to Draft:
At 5’9.75″ and 160 lbs, Griffin is well below the NHL average size for a center, and his physical game remains underdeveloped. He averaged just 0.48 hits per game and was on the receiving end of 1.12, showing a willingness to take hits but at what cost to his frame as he plays against professionals? His puck battle win rate was only 42%, and he gave the puck away 4.6 times per game—numbers that highlight the potential physical mismatch at higher levels. While he plays a smart, skilled game, his lack of separation gear and physical strength could limit his effectiveness against pro defenders.
Projection:
Griffin projects as a skilled, bottom-six professional center or wing who could excel in a fast-paced, puck-possession system. Continued physical development, paired with added explosiveness and strength, will be essential to translating his skill to the pro level.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free Agent.
Griffin’s offensive IQ, passing accuracy, and ability to execute with pace give him legitimate upside, but his size and battle inefficiency make him a longer-term project. If he adds weight and continues producing, he could carve out a role as a skilled depth forward.
Matthew Hutchison (G, R, 6’3″, 191, Moose Jaw Warriors, 10/07/2006)
Matthew Hutchison is a good-sized left-catching goaltender who split the 2024–25 season between the Vancouver Giants and Moose Jaw Warriors, appearing in 41 total WHL games. His tools include size, structure, and athleticism, but his results have been inconsistent across both teams.
Reasons to Draft:
Hutchison possesses an NHL goalie frame at 6’2.5″ and 189 lbs, and he uses it well to fill space when square to shooters. His stance is upright and efficient, with smooth transitions into the butterfly and decent post-to-post movement. While his numbers aren’t eye-popping, Hutchison improved his save percentage after his midseason move to Moose Jaw (.899) and kept games close despite a high-volume workload. He tracks pucks fairly well and can battle through traffic, maintaining composure when facing pressure. In the right system, his frame and mental approach give him a foundation that could be further developed.
Reasons Not to Draft:
Despite the physical tools, Hutchison’s statistical output was below average for draft-eligible WHL netminders. A combined .886 save percentage and 3.91 goals-against average over 41 games shows inconsistency and difficulty controlling second chances. He allowed too many clean looks off the rush, often late reacting to lateral plays or shots through traffic. He showed issues with locking down games or maintaining focus over 60 minutes. His rebound control and tracking can be erratic when under sustained pressure, and he’s still refining his puck-handling decision-making.
Projection:
Hutchison projects as a long-term project who could become a serviceable pro backup if his technical consistency and puck-tracking improve. His size and athletic base are appealing, but he will need multiple years of development at the junior, NCAA and AHL level before NHL consideration.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free Agent.
Hutchison’s size and competitive base are draft-worthy traits, but the lack of performance consistency makes him a development swing rather than a safe bet. If selected, he should enter an organization with strong goalie development infrastructure.
Benjamin Wilmott (C, L, 6’1″, 186, Sioux Falls Stampede, 08/30/2006, Ohio State)
Benjamin Wilmott is a dual-threat center with above-average puck skill, vision, and spatial awareness who played a top-six role for Sioux Falls in the USHL. He averaged 16:52 TOI with consistent power play usage and showed the offensive toolkit to be a possession driver.
Statistical Profile (per game):
TOI: 16:52
PPT/SHT: 2:35 / 0:58
FO Win %: 53% on 12 draws per game
Shots / SOG: 3.5 / 1.93
Scoring Chances / SC%: 1.53 chances, 14% conversion
Puck Battles / Win %: 13 battles, 48% win rate
Pass Completion: 84%
Takeaways / Giveaways: 0.95 / 3.2
Blocked Shots: 0.39
Reasons to Draft:
Wilmott is an agile, high-skill center who makes intelligent reads and drives transition play with speed and puck control. His hands allow him to maneuver through traffic, and he’s highly effective at drawing defenders before distributing pucks to open teammates. His 53% faceoff success rate adds center utility, and he was a reliable offensive zone driver with 3.5 shot attempts and 1.53 scoring chances per game. His ability to shoot or pass with equal threat makes him difficult to defend one-on-one. He’s also competitive enough to contribute defensively and block shots, and his 84% passing success shows he’s not forcing low-percentage plays.
Reasons Not to Draft:
While offensively talented, Wilmott’s defensive detail and puck management remain areas of concern. His giveaway rate (4.8 per game) is too high, especially considering his 48% puck battle win rate — slightly below average for a center his size. His defensive zone contributions (6:41 PID) were steady but not standout, and he’ll need to show more off-puck physicality and compete to round out his game. Additionally, while 6’0.5″, 184 lbs is just slightly below average for an NHL player, he doesn’t consistently leverage his frame in contested situations or to generate inside scoring chances.
Projection:
Wilmott projects as a skilled, middle-six offensive forward who could play on a second power play unit and be a complementary driver at the NCAA level. If he strengthens his two-way detail and reduces puck turnover risk, he has the tools to compete for a pro contract and eventually push for NHL depth role consideration.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free Agent
Offensive instincts, puck skill, and power play IQ are worthy of investment. Development will hinge on improving decision-making under pressure and rounding out his game defensively.
Shawn Carrier (LW, L, 5’10”, 185, Halifax Mooseheads, 03/14/2007)
Shawn Carrier is a high-compete, high-usage left shot forward with explosive skating, strong offensive instincts, and the willingness to play in hard areas. While undersized relative to pro benchmarks, Carrier’s tenacity, transition speed, and power play volume make him one of the more impactful puck-driving forwards in Halifax’s lineup. He plays in all situations and logs nearly 20 minutes per game, contributing as both a forechecker and creator off the rush.
Statistical Profile (per game):
TOI: 19:54
PPT/SHT: 3:31 / 1:03
FO Win %: 36% on 0.5 draws per game
Shots / SOG: 7.0 / 3.8
Scoring Chances / SC%: 3.0 chances, 8% conversion
Puck Battles / Win %: 14 battles, 45% win rate
Pass Completion: 81%
Takeaways / Giveaways: 3.8 / 6
Blocked Shots: 0.54
Reasons to Draft:
Carrier’s dynamic skating stands out immediately. He plays at a high pace and consistently pushes defenders back with his straight-line speed, especially in transition. He’s a volume shooter who generates over three scoring chances per game, and his footspeed and edge work allow him to draw penalties and disrupt breakouts with a relentless forecheck. Despite his height, he plays with assertiveness, getting to the net front and engaging physically. His time on both special teams underscores trust from his coaching staff, and his game-driving potential is evident when he’s in motion and forcing defenders to react. He creates space with his legs and has flashed playmaking ability on the rush.
Reasons Not to Draft:
Carrier’s puck management and efficiency need continued focused development. He averaged nearly four giveaways per game and completed just 81% of his passes, both metrics below NHL draft standards for smaller skilled forwards. His scoring chance conversion rate is low (8%), despite generating chances in volume, and he tends to rush shots into traffic rather than delay or create better lanes. Additionally, his 36% faceoff success rate limits his utility as a full-time center at higher levels, and his 45% puck battle win rate shows he’s still learning how to consistently win possession against heavier competition. He’ll need to prove he can process and execute quicker at pace, especially in traffic, and defend effectively without the puck.
Projection:
Carrier projects as a bottom-six energy forward with power play utility if he can continue improving his passing, puck protection, and defensive reads. His skating gives him a shot to climb the ranks as a disruptive forechecker or offensive-zone driver, particularly in a winger role at the next level.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free Agent
Explosive skating, competitiveness, and offensive pressure generation make him an intriguing late-round target. He’ll need development time to round out his playmaking and win more puck battles, but his motor and speed are NHL-caliber traits. We recommend a priority free agent after two years of NCAA hockey.
Alex Misiak (RW, L, 6’0″, 180, Waterloo Black Hawks, 06/22/2007)
Alex Misiak is a versatile right winger with strong offensive instincts, good puck skills, and a competitive edge. He plays a middle-six role for Waterloo and sees power play time, where his ability to shoot in motion and distribute from the flank stands out. While not a flashy player, Misiak blends skill, effort, and intelligence to contribute in all three zones, showing an understanding of spacing and timing that supports effective playmaking.
Statistical Profile (per game):
TOI: 13:26
PPT/SHT: 1:51 / 0:01
FO Win % (limited reps): 56%
Hits / Taken: 1.44 / 0.73
Shots / SOG: 2.9 / 1.71
Scoring Chances / SC%: 1.04 / 17%
Puck Battles / Win %: 11 / 45%
Pass Completion: 81%
Takeaways / Giveaways: 2.8 /4.5
Blocked Shots: 0.24
Reasons to Draft:
Misiak brings middle-six upside as a forward who consistently plays with structure, intelligence, and purpose. Offensively, he scores at an efficient rate (17% SC%) and can create off the wall with clean puck touches and vision. His shot is accurate, deceptive and quick, and he’s shown the ability to find quiet ice in the offensive zone. His passing is below average, with an 81% completion rate, but he consistently generates chances at even strength and on the man advantage. Off the puck, Misiak competes on entries, initiates contact (1.4 hits/game), and is willing to block shots. He makes smart, simple decisions and executes reliably in system play.
Reasons Not to Draft:
Misiak’s ceiling may be limited due to a lack of dynamic pace and average puck battle win rate (45%), which raises concerns about his ability to consistently win possession against National League level opponents. He can also struggle under pressure when forced to play through traffic, and his 4.5 giveaways per game show inconsistency in his handling and processing speed at full pace. His impact without the puck is subtle rather than disruptive, and he may be better suited for a complementary role rather than a line-driving one. His game lacks explosiveness, which could limit his ability to separate at higher levels.
Projection:
Misiak projects as a bottom-six NHL winger with an antagonistic match-up upside if he can continue improving his pace and his ability to win contested puck battles. He fits well in a system-driven, structured role where he can support skilled linemates and make consistent plays under control.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free Agent
Misiak’s blend of hockey sense, shooting efficiency, and positional reliability makes him a worthwhile long term target. While his physical and pace-related limitations must be addressed, his offensive efficiency and detail-oriented game offer a foundation to build on.
Evan Passmore (D, R, 6’5″, 212, Barrie Colts, 12/05/2006)
Evan Passmore is a physically mature, stay-at-home right-shot defenseman who plays a structured, defense-first game for the Barrie Colts. At 6’4.75″, 212 lbs, he already possesses NHL size and uses it effectively in net-front coverage, down low, and in physical confrontations. His role this season has centered on penalty killing and match-up defense, averaging 13:38 TOI per game, including 1:40 per game on the PK and limited (0:10) usage on the power play.
Reasons to Draft:
Passmore’s NHL frame is a major asset, and he uses it to his advantage. He delivers 1.4 hits per game and wins 58% of his puck battles, a solid rate for a defenseman primarily defending his own zone (6:37 PID). He’s not flashy, but he plays within himself—his 88% pass completion rate reflects poised, simple puck movement, and his giveaways are relatively low (2.9 GA/game) given his usage. He blocks shots (1.4 BL/game), takes away space with an active stick (4.7 TA/game), and provides consistency in defensive assignments. His long reach and body positioning help seal off lanes, especially on the penalty kill. When he retrieves pucks (1.17 PRS/game), he tends to make safe outlet plays and avoids unnecessary risks.
Reasons Not to Draft:
Passmore’s upside is limited. He contributes almost nothing offensively (0.14 SC/game, 0.20 PSP/game) and doesn’t project to play special teams beyond the penalty kill. His mobility is still developing, particularly when retrieving pucks under pressure or when asked to transition play north quickly. His shot is ineffective (0.65 SOG/game, 0.33 SC%) and lacks pace or deception. His involvement in the offensive zone is minimal (5:17 PIA), and he often defers when faced with a chance to activate. At this point he’s not agile enough to break pucks out under pressure or recover if beaten wide. At times, he’s overly passive, relying on size rather than assertive decision-making.
Projection:
If drafted, Passmore projects as a depth, shutdown defenseman at the pro level—likely as an AHL defender or a potential injury call-up type who can kill penalties and play safe minutes. His game is reliant on structure, size, and defensive reads but lacks transition skill or offensive contribution.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free Agent
While Passmore’s size and defensive reliability make him intriguing, his ceiling is low due to limited puck play, skating, and offensive value. He could be a worthwhile late-round project if a team is looking for a penalty-killing, defensive defenseman with NHL physical traits. However, without improved pace and decision-making under pressure, he may plateau as a depth minor pro.
Artem Frolov (D, L, 6’11”, 192, Flint Firebirds, 01/01/2007)
This left-shot defenseman from Flint plays a depth role on the Firebirds’ blue line, averaging just under 12 minutes per game. His ice time is distributed across both zones (5:30 PIA / 4:43 PID), with minimal deployment on special teams (0:16 PPT / 0:15 SHT), signaling a 5-on-5-focused assignment. At 5’11.5″, 191 lbs, he falls slightly below NHL average for a defenseman in terms of height, but he’s filled out physically and has shown glimpses of poise and execution that warrant tracking.
Reasons to Draft:
He displays solid efficiency and composure when in possession. His pass completion rate is high (87%), and he wins 51% of his puck battles, which, while not dominant, indicates reliability in retrieval and containment situations. His shot selection is deliberate—posting 1.93 shot attempts and 0.76 shots on goal per game—while his 18% scoring chance conversion rate (albeit from limited volume) suggests he’s opportunistic when given space. The defender does a good job avoiding panic plays under pressure, as reflected by a modest 2.8 giveaways per game versus a strong 5.4 takeaways per game. His defensive reads and ice positioning lead to a consistent 1.1 blocked shots per game.
Reasons Not to Draft:
He doesn’t drive play or dictate pace. His usage and role indicate limited trust in high-leverage or special teams situations, and he’s not generating many quality scoring chances (only 0.16 SC/game). His game lacks physical edge—he delivers just 0.37 hits/game—and he doesn’t separate players from pucks consistently. Offensively, his output is modest with limited pre-shot creation (0.4 PSP/game), and he’s not a power play option at this stage. His skating lacks explosiveness, which shows when transitioning under pressure or defending against speed down the wall.
Projection:
Projects as a potential depth AHL defenseman or third-pairing junior player with limited pro ceiling. He’s reliable enough with the puck and defends within structure but lacks the dynamic skating, physical assertiveness, and play-driving instincts to project into an NHL role unless he adds more pace and presence.
Draft Recommendation:
Free Agent Watchlist
While fundamentally sound and steady, his current trajectory doesn’t indicate enough upside to warrant a draft pick. However, continued physical development and an expanded role next season could justify further monitoring as a potential late bloomer or overage signing candidate.
Andrei Kuryanov (LW, L, 5’10”, 163, Omskie Yastreby, 07/20/2007)
Kuryanov is a smaller-framed center playing a prominent offensive role for Omsk’s MHL squad, averaging over 16 minutes a night with nearly two full minutes of power play usage. He’s heavily leaned on in the offensive zone (8:17 PIA vs. 5:33 PID) and has produced consistently despite size disadvantages at the MHL level. He plays with pace, instincts, and offensive touch, though concerns exist around physical projection and play through contact.
Reasons to Draft:
Kuryanov excels in high-tempo, offensive situations. He attempts 4.0 shots and puts 2.2 on goal per game while generating 1.58 scoring chances, showing he can both get pucks through and create danger. He’s a strong distributor with a high pass accuracy (86%) and produces pre-shot passes at a 1.02 clip per game, reflecting vision and spatial awareness. He wins 57% of his faceoffs and has a manageable recovery-to-turnover ratio (3.33 takeaways vs. 4.5 giveaways), which supports a projection as a reliable puck possession center. His tenacity is evident in the 13 puck battles per game he engages in, even if he only wins 43%, and his shift-to-shift competitiveness gives him value beyond skill.
Reasons Not to Draft:
Kuryanov’s lack of size (5’10”, 163 lbs) and modest puck battle win rate raise concerns about translatability to the North American pro game. Despite frequent offensive involvement, his scoring chance conversion rate is low (7%), and his impact in the defensive zone is limited. He doesn’t consistently separate from contact or win contested space. His game is tilted toward the offensive side, and he hasn’t shown consistent defensive detail or physical assertiveness. At his current weight, strength deficits may limit his ability to handle pace and pressure at the pro level.
Projection:
Kuryanov projects as a skilled offensive minded center at the pro level if he can add muscle and improve his puck protection. His game resembles that of a puck-distributing middle-six playmaker in junior, but to transition beyond that, he’ll need to become more effective below the dots and add layers of strength and physical resilience to his toolkit.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free Agent
Kuryanov’s hockey sense, hands, and offensive motor are draftable tools. If he continues developing physically and improves his efficiency through the middle, he could earn a role as a skilled, tempo-driving pivot. Low-risk, medium-reward profile.
Nathan Lecompte (C, R, 5’9″, 168, Chicoutimi Sagueneens, 01/19/2007)
Lecompte is a diminutive right-shot center who logs over 16 minutes per game for Chicoutimi, including nearly three minutes on the power play. He plays a high-tempo, offensively tilted game, showing creativity and quickness in transition. While his hockey sense and skill level are readily apparent, concerns about size, puck battle effectiveness, and physical projection raise questions about his ability to withstand the demands of pro hockey.
Reasons to Draft:
Lecompte is a dynamic play-driver at the junior level with elite-level quickness and lateral agility. He attempts 4.7 shots per game and lands 2.4 on goal while generating nearly two Grade-A scoring chances per game (1.92). He moves pucks with accuracy (87% completion) and creates offense consistently via 1.15 pre-shot passes per game. He sees the ice well and initiates plays with purpose, particularly on the man advantage. His defensive commitment is adequate, and his takeaway-to-giveaway ratio (3.3 to 4.9) is not a deterring number. Despite his size, he doesn’t shy from playing between the dots and logs over six minutes per game in the defensive zone.
Reasons Not to Draft:
At 5’8.75″ and 167 lbs, Lecompte is well below average for NHL centers, and his 39% puck battle win rate (on 11 attempts per game) reflects those limitations. At this point he’s not physically strong enough to consistently win contested areas or protect pucks under pressure. His faceoff win rate (46%) is below standard and will likely dip further against older, stronger competition. Despite strong offensive metrics, he only converts on 9% of his Grade-A chances — meaning he will struggle to finish when time and space diminish in professional hockey. While elusive, his lack of strength and linear explosiveness could limit his ability to transition to a higher level.
Projection:
Lecompte projects as a skilled junior scorer with limited National League translatability unless he adds strength and power which leads him to a specialized offensive role. If development continues, he could fill a bottom-six energy role or serve as a power play specialist with pace and vision. However, size and puck battle inefficiency are real obstacles.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free Agent
While Lecompte’s skating and skill level merit attention, his size, physical limitations, and low puck battle success rate make him a long shot for the NHL. Continued tracking is advised, particularly if he adds strength and improves his in-zone competitiveness. A potential late bloomer worth revisiting as a free agent or camp invitee.
Bjorn Bronas (G, L, 6’2″, 188, Sioux City Musketeers, 02/25/2007, Minnesota State)
Bronas is a fundamentally sound goaltender with a strong technical base, clean movements, and solid rebound control. A Minnesota State commit, he profiles as a structured, calm presence in the crease, built more around efficiency than flash. He plays a composed game and has the intelligence to manage play around the net, though limitations in power and lateral explosiveness could impact his ceiling at the pro level.
Reasons to Draft:
Although Bronas is undersized by National League standards at 6’1.5″, 188 lbs, he displays a refined foundation that should translate well to higher levels. He positions himself effectively, typically staying centered with balance and structure. His tracking is steady, and his static hand positioning from a wide stance supports both puck control and lateral coverage. His ability to seal the ice in tight and his comfort handling sharp-angle or behind-the-net play indicate composure and attention to technical detail. Rebound control is a strength, and his ability to limit second-chance opportunities adds to his reliability. Though his movement lacks dynamic explosiveness, his skating base allows for consistent crease management.
Reasons Not to Draft:
The biggest concern with Bronas lies in his lack of explosive power and lateral mobility. His wide base and technique-centric approach occasionally limit his ability to regain positioning or execute lateral recoveries with the quickness / explosiveness that will be required for NHL success. He shows balance inefficiencies when his knees or feet widen, diminishing power in movement and impacting his ability to adjust east-west. With only a 0.894 save percentage and 3.12 GAA over 25 games, his production this season is solid but not elite. These indicators suggest a developmental goaltender more reliant on refinement than raw upside.
Projection:
Bronas projects as a structured NCAA starter with long-term upside as a pro backup or organizational depth goaltender. His technical base and calm demeanor offer a solid foundation, but without increased mobility and explosive movement, his NHL ceiling is limited.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free Agent
Bronas offers enough technical consistency, size, and poise to warrant investment as a developmental goaltender. The physical tools and foundational habits are present, but NHL potential will depend on how much power and athleticism he can add during his NCAA years.
Alonso Gosselin (D, L, 6’1″, 195, Chicoutimi Sagueneens, 08/13/2007)
Alonso Gosselin is a mobile, left-shot defenseman with above-average skating ability and strong puck-moving instincts. He has a pro-sized frame and has earned secondary minutes at even strength and on the penalty kill. While he shows flashes of offensive involvement, Gosselin’s identity as a defender is still forming, and he is currently more of a transitional support piece than a driver of play.
Statistical Profile (2024–25):
TOI: 15:29 , SHT: 1:17 , PIA/PID: 6:29 / 6:53
Hits Given/Taken: 0.51 / 1.46
Shots/On Goal/Missed/Blocked: 3.3 / 1.52 / 0.8 / 0.97
Scoring Chances: 0.61 per game, scoring on 7%
Puck Battles (Win %): 10 per game (56%)
Pass Completion: 83% , Pre-Shot Passes: 0.42
Takeaways/Giveaways: 6 / 4.6 per game
Loose Puck Recoveries: 1.72 , Blocked Shots: 0.68
Reasons to Draft:
Gosselin possesses several traits that are valued in modern NHL defensemen: mobility, puck retrieval efficiency, and transition execution. His 56% win rate on puck battles and 83% pass completion indicate a player who handles pressure effectively and makes responsible decisions on retrievals. He averages over three shot attempts per game and is active in his breakout support, showing comfort jumping into the rush. His defensive zone time is well-balanced with offensive zone usage considering he logs penalty kill minutes regularly. At nearly 6’1″, 195 lbs, he already meets pro-level size benchmarks and will benefit from additional physical maturity. Gosselin’s high battle rate and effective stick detail in all three zones show he is an intelligent defender who processes play well.
Reasons Not to Draft:
Despite his tools, Gosselin lacks identity and assertiveness in key moments. His offensive impact is limited—averaging fewer than one shot on goal per game and a modest 7% conversion rate on scoring chances. He does not yet control play from the back end or quarterback power plays, and his lack of power play involvement (00:07 PPT average) speaks to limited puck management confidence in high-leverage offensive roles. Physically, he receives more hits than he gives — 0.51 hits per game is low for a player his size and usage. He will need to develop a more physical, engaged style in his own zone to succeed in pro environments. His giveaway rate (4.6 per game) is high relative to his passing attempts and reflects a player who still forces plays or hesitates under pressure. The gap between his flashes and full-game consistency remains significant.
Projection:
With proper development, Gosselin projects as a bottom-pairing two-way defenseman or depth NHL call-up option. He is not yet assertive enough to project as an NHL defender or primary special teams contributor but has the skating, frame, and game sense to develop into a reliable supporting piece if he continues to mature and commit to a defined role.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free Agent
Gosselin is a viable developmental target due to his size, mobility, and transitional upside. He will need to define his defensive identity and improve his assertiveness in all zones. A late-bloomer candidate who could benefit significantly from structured development and weight room gains.
Jack Pechar (RW, R, 6’1″, 198, Lincoln Stars, 03/20/2005, Northeastern)
Jack Pechar is a versatile, right-shot forward with strong two-way habits and positional flexibility. Typically used as a center, Pechar has shown the ability to handle wing responsibilities effectively, including understanding faceoff plans, board battles, and defensive zone coverage. He offers a mature physical profile for the USHL level, skates with power, and processes the game well, making him a stabilizing presence in high-leverage situations.
Statistical Profile (2024–25):
TOI: 17:48 , PPT: 2:44 , SHT: 1:45
FO%: 53% on 17 draws/game
Hits Given/Taken: 0.38 / 0.76
Shots/On Goal: 4.1 / 2.7 per game
Grade “A” Scoring Chances: 2.3 per game , 17% conversion
Puck Battles: 11 per game , 51% win rate
Pass Completion: 86% , Pre-Shot Passes: 1.61
Takeaways/Giveaways: 4.1 / 5.7
Puck Retrievals After Shots: 1.95 , Shot Blocks: 0.68
Reasons to Draft:
Pechar checks several boxes for a modern bottom-six NHL forward with potential utility higher in a lineup. He has the size (6’1″, 198 lbs), skating power, and hockey IQ to play up the middle or on the wing. His faceoff performance (53% on high volume) adds value, and his consistent 2+ grade “A” scoring chances per game with a solid 17% conversion rate show deception and scoring touch in tight. Pechar processes quickly in-zone, completes 86% of passes, and generates over 1.6 pre-shot passes per game— solid vision and tempo control. He earns significant special teams time (over 4:30 combined PPT/SHT per game), reflecting trust from his coaching staff. His physical strength is evident in puck protection and net-front presence, and he retrieves pucks well after shots, allowing his team to sustain offensive pressure.
Reasons Not to Draft:
Pechar’s upside may be limited by a lack of standout traits. He does a lot of things well but isn’t dynamic in any one area. His hit rate (0.38 per game) is low for a 198-pound forward and suggests room for growth in physical engagement and nastiness. Despite strong puck retrieval numbers, his puck losses (5.7 per game) are high relative to his role and usage, pointing to moments of overhandling or forced plays under pressure. His skating is functional but not yet explosive, and while his offensive zone play is composed, he lacks the separation gear or deception to consistently beat defenders 1-on-1 at higher levels. He plays a clean, composed game, but Neutral Zone views him more as a complementary player than a driver at the professional level.
Projection:
Pechar projects as a depth center or wing at the pro level, with potential to rise into a third-line role due to his intelligence, size, and puck management. With further development in his puck protection, pace, and shot selection, he could become a versatile, low-maintenance option who supports scoring depth and provides value on both special teams units.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free Agent
Pechar’s physical tools, positional versatility, and well-rounded approach give him a strong floor. While he lacks a clear standout trait, his combination of size, faceoff skill, hockey sense, and coachability make him a safe organizational asset who could push for pro minutes after time in college and the American Hockey League.
Jayden Kraus (G, R, 6’2″, 201, Victoria Royals, 11/18/2006)
Jayden Kraus is a technically sound and composed goaltender with slightly below average size and a calm, efficient approach in the crease. In 46 appearances during the 2024–25 season, Kraus posted a 2.86 GAA and .908 save percentage—solid numbers on a Victoria team that often relied heavily on his poise and positioning to weather high shot volumes. His average of 12 scoring area saves per game and 0.850 scoring area save percentage underscore his ability to make timely stops under pressure. Kraus reads the play well, tracks pucks through traffic, and is an intelligent puck handler, often neutralizing opposing forechecks with confident, direct plays to his defensemen.
Kraus presents strong foundational traits for a modern goaltender: processing, poise, and an ability to manage the game’s pace with smart puck movement. He routinely displays a calm, deliberate style that minimizes wasted motion and supports strong rebound recovery positioning. He is well-versed in the technical elements of the position, sealing the ice effectively and keeping his shoulders square to shooters. His scoring-area metrics—12 scoring area saves per game and 2.6 saves above expected—are evidence of a goaltender who consistently outperforms baseline expectations. Kraus’s body control and ability to stay tall through screens enable him to absorb pucks cleanly, especially low, where he uses his legs effectively to close holes. He offers starter reliability and doesn’t rattle under sustained pressure.
Reasons Not to Draft:
While technically sharp, at his size we feel Kraus’s athletic ceiling is average. He lacks the explosive post-to-post movement and twitch reflexes associated with high-end goaltending prospects under 6’2″. At times, his calm demeanor borders on passive, particularly when reacting to lateral plays or scrambles around the crease. His rebound control—especially blocker-side—is inconsistent, often allowing second-chance opportunities in high-danger areas. Though composed, he occasionally collapses unnecessarily, which can hinder his ability to stay square and up on initial shots. His lateral skating and edge work require continued development to better handle fast-moving plays below the dots. Without improvements in these areas, his game risks becoming too reliant on positioning and less able to handle the pace and skill of NHL shooters.
Projection:
Kraus profiles as a developmental goaltender who, with time and targeted refinement, could become a reliable backup or low-end starter at the NHL level. His game management and mental poise give him a high floor, but his ability to add explosiveness and improve blocker-side rebound control will determine how far he can rise in a professional system.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free Agent
Kraus has the technical base and mental tools NHL teams look for. He may lack the length and standout athleticism of a top-tier prospect, but he wins with structure, intelligence, and control. With proper development—particularly focused on lateral movement, explosiveness, and rebound suppression—Kraus could earn a role as a dependable, low-maintenance pro goaltender who wins games.
Maxim Moiseyev (D, R, 6’1″, 167, Omskie Yastreby, 08/07/2007)
Maxim Moiseyev is a mobile, puck-moving right-shot defenseman who shows flashes of offensive upside but remains raw in nearly every aspect of his defensive game. At 6’1″ and just 167 lbs, he is notably underdeveloped physically relative to his peers, and while he skates well and has soft hands, his current play lacks the defensive discipline, structure, and situational awareness required for NHL-level projection. In limited action this season at the MHL level, Moiseyev averaged 14:45 TOI with 1:15 on the power play and 0:45 on the penalty kill—indicating trust in specialized roles but limited overall impact.
Reasons to Draft:
Moiseyev possesses clear offensive instincts. He skates well with a fluid stride, regularly activates from the point, and has a pass completion rate of 89%, which is impressive for a young, offensive-minded defenseman. His puck handling and ability to deliver hard flat passes make him a potential power play quarterback with time. He’s active in transition, shows composure with the puck, and has a knack for timing jumps into soft areas, registering 0.52 scoring chances per game and shooting with reasonable efficiency (13% SC%). Defensively, his 57% puck battle win rate and 1.08 shot blocks per game show a willingness to engage, and his skating base gives him recovery tools when managed correctly.
Reasons Not to Draft:
The concern with Moiseyev is less about skill and more about defensive IQ and physical readiness. He lacks physical strength (167 lbs) and struggles in containment battles down low or net-front, where he’s largely ineffective at clearing the crease or absorbing contact. His gap control and positional awareness are weak—he gets pulled out of structure and is easily exploited when play breaks down. He averaged just 0.1 hits per game and has a low takeaway-to-giveaway ratio, highlighting his passivity and susceptibility under pressure. While he’s aggressive in joining the rush, his timing is often poor and leads to odd-man rushes against. He is a project in every sense defensively and would require extensive time to mature both mentally and physically.
Projection:
Moiseyev projects as a long-term developmental defenseman with potential third-pair/power play upside if his defensive game catches up. He will need to add significant strength, learn structured zone coverage, and improve his decision-making under pressure. If he cannot do that, his game may not translate beyond the junior or lower-tier pro levels.
Draft Recommendation:
Potential Free Agent
Moiseyev has the puck skills, skating ability, and offensive awareness to warrant tracking, but he’s a significant project at this stage. Teams with strong development pipelines may consider spending a late-round pick on his upside, but his defensive liabilities and lack of physical maturity mean he’s not yet ready for meaningful North American competition. If undrafted, he should remain on a free agent watchlist as he gains experience in the MHL or other European pro leagues.
Louis-Alex Tremblay (D, R, 5’9″, 175, Sherbrooke Phoenix, 02/05/2007)
Louis-Alex Tremblay is a highly mobile, puck-moving right-shot defenseman who plays heavy minutes in all situations for Sherbrooke. Despite his sub-5’9″ frame, he averages 21:01 TOI per game, with 3:35 on the power play and over a minute short-handed. His play is driven by elite vision, strong puck skills, and a calm, confident demeanor under pressure. Tremblay thrives in transition and excels at moving the puck through layers with pace and purpose. He plays with intelligence and poise, routinely handling first-touch pressure and turning it into offensive momentum.
Reasons to Draft:
Tremblay drives play from the back end with his feet and head. He leads breakouts and zone entries with control, thanks to his vision and a pass completion rate of 89%. He averages 1.21 pre-shot passes per game—one of the higher marks among QMJHL defensemen—and his 4.8 shot attempts per game highlights his assertive offensive mindset. On the power play, he moves well along the line, maintains zone time by keeping attempted clears in play, and consistently opens shooting lanes with deception and lateral puck movement. Defensively, he’s reliable despite his size. He blocks 1.28 shots per game, wins 60% of puck battles, and maintains structure while reading play direction well. His poise under pressure on retrievals (1.82 PRS/game) helps facilitate clean breakouts.
Reasons Not to Draft:
The biggest concern with Tremblay is size and foot speed. At 5’8.5″, 175 lbs, he is significantly smaller than average for NHL defensemen at every level of the pro pipeline. Though he compensates with smarts and mobility, he can be knocked off pucks and struggles at times against heavy forechecks. While he wins puck battles in the QMJHL, it’s unclear if that translates against larger, faster National League level opponents. His skating is more fluid than explosive—his first step and lateral mobility are clear focusses for development. He creates chances, but with only a 5.3% conversion rate on his 0.54 scoring chances per game, his shot lacks the power and deception to beat goalies cleanly. Defensively, he relies heavily on positioning and active stick but doesn’t physically deter net-front presence.
Projection:
Tremblay projects as a modern puck-moving defenseman who could run a power-play unit and drive transition at the professional level. He is an undersized offensive defenseman who can push pace and produce complementary offense. For professional success and opportunity, he must develop more burst in his stride and improve play strength to manage defensive zone mismatches.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free Agent
Tremblay’s ability to play significant minutes in all situations and his exceptional hockey sense merit consideration, even with size and skating concerns. His value lies in his puck movement, offensive touch, and coachable defensive habits. If passed over in the draft, he should be monitored closely as a potential free agent target for teams that prioritize puck possession and offensive transition from the back end.
Masun Fleece (RW, R, 5’9″, 176, Sherwood Park Crusaders, 01/26/2007, Penn State)
Masun Fleece is an undersized but highly competitive right shot winger who plays a direct, high-tempo style driven by speed, work ethic, and offensive instincts. Through 28 BCHL games this season, he’s posted 14 goals and 28 points while averaging 13:40 TOI per game, including 1:59 on the power play. His skating is a clear asset, and he uses his quickness to pressure defenders, drive pucks wide, and find inside ice without hesitation. Despite being below average size by NHL standards, Fleece consistently battles in traffic and along the boards, winning 49% of puck battles and drawing 0.45 penalties per game due to his pace and willingness to engage.
Reasons to Draft:
Fleece’s game revolves around speed, puck pursuit, and offensive urgency. He attacks off the rush with purpose and has the skill to handle pucks at full speed. He generates 2.1 scoring chances per game and maintains a 13% scoring chance conversion rate, showing that he’s not just generating volume, but also capitalizing on quality looks. He wins pucks back with active stick pressure (2.4 takeaways/game) and plays with consistent edge despite giving up size. He handles power play time effectively by scanning well in the offensive zone. His tenacity, combined with his ability to tip pucks, drive the net, and release in stride, creates real offensive threat. He competes hard, supports pucks well on the forecheck, and can retrieve (1.6 PRS/game) and redistribute with control.
Reasons Not to Draft:
At 5’9.25″, 175 lbs, Fleece is significantly undersized for a winger projecting to the NHL game. While his battle level is high, he struggles to maintain body position when leaned on and can be muscled off the puck in extended zone time. He wins pucks with quickness, not strength, and he has a 49% puck battle win rate in the BCHL, a mark that’s likely to drop as he climbs levels. His defensive zone play is functional but not standout—his limited short-handed usage (0:05 SHT/game) reflects this. Turnovers remain an area for concern (5.1 giveaways/game), especially in contested traffic and his pass completion percentage is well below average at 75%. He plays fast, but occasionally overextends on zone entries or puck touches, leading to transitions against. Fleece needs more physical strength and structure in his 200-foot game to be reliable at higher levels.
Projection:
Fleece projects as a high-motor winger with offensive upside and the potential to contribute on a power play unit. If he can add strength and improve puck management under pressure, he could be a forward who plays fast, draws penalties, and creates secondary scoring at a pro level. At minimum, his speed and compete level make him a strong candidate for success in the NCAA game, with pro potential depending on his physical development.
Draft Recommendation:
Free Agent
Fleece’s skating, offensive instincts, and tenacity make him a compelling upside bet. While undersized, his high pace and willingness to play in hard areas give him the foundation to compete for a professional role if he rounds out his game and continues to produce at higher levels. His BCHL production and energy-driven style warrant professional consideration for teams looking to add speed and pace to their depth chart.
Will Murphy (D, L, 6’4″, 210, Cape Breton Eagles, 08/24/2007)
Will Murphy is a physically mature left-shot defenseman with a steady presence and intelligent puck distribution habits. He has played a bottom-pair role for Cape Breton, averaging 13:06 of ice time per game with minimal power play usage (0:01) and a regular short-handed presence (0:58). Murphy’s value lies in his ability to manage pucks under pressure and keep plays simple, enabling clean exits and supporting transition without overcomplicating decisions. His size (6’3.5″, 209 lbs) and 59% puck battle win rate are clear strengths relative to his age and league averages, giving him a strong base as a shutdown presence.
Reasons to Draft:
Murphy offers a reliable, efficient style from the back end. He completes 84% of his passes and averages 5.2 takeaways per game, showing consistency in both retrieval and breakout situations. His play recognition is above average—he routinely makes high-percentage decisions in his own zone and maintains a calm demeanor under pressure. Despite limited offensive zone usage, he contributes 0.78 shots on goal per game and shows a willingness to get pucks through traffic when the opportunity presents itself. With 1.14 puck retrievals after shots per game and 1.7 blocked shots, Murphy plays a responsible, structured game and is comfortable sacrificing his body to support team defense. He moves well for his size, and while he’s not dynamic, his upright posture and gap control keep opposing forwards to the perimeter. The combination of size, composure, and detail work presents a dependable late-developing profile.
Reasons Not to Draft:
Murphy is still developing consistency with his puck skills and offensive game, generating just 0.15 scoring chances per game and contributing minimally on the offensive side of the puck. His shot selection is conservative, with 0.97 attempted shots per game and a low overall conversion rate (11% SC%). He doesn’t offer much deception or mobility with the puck, and while his 2.8 giveaways per game are a highlight, he sometimes struggles handling pressure in tighter areas. His physical edge, while coveted, can lead to minor penalties or reaching when trying to finish hits (1.45 hits per game, 0.75 received). There’s also room for development in his lateral footwork, particularly defending against smaller, shiftier forwards. Though not a liability, his upside may be limited to a depth role unless he can develop more assertiveness and pace.
Projection:
Murphy projects as a depth, stay-at-home defenseman with penalty killing upside and bottom-pair NHL potential. He will need to prove he can consistently handle faster pace and more dynamic forechecks, but his size, hockey sense, and disciplined approach give him a foundation that should translate well to higher levels of play if developed with patience.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free Agent
While not a high-ceiling prospect, Murphy checks boxes for a development role: size, intelligence, positional awareness, and a team-first mentality. He is a strong candidate to earn a bottom-pairing or penalty-killing role down the line in a National League organization if given time to improve his skating and handle puck pressure. Worth monitoring and potentially investing in as a long-view defensive prospect.
Gabriel Smith (D, L, 6’3″, 197, Owen Sound Attack, 01/01/2007)
Gabriel Smith is a physically mature, left-shot defenseman who plays a structured, reliable defensive game with flashes of puck-moving ability. Averaging 14:04 TOI per game with a significant short-handed presence (1:35 SHT) and limited power play usage, Smith has embraced a stay-at-home role while showing potential to impact transition offense. His size and reach (6’3.25″, 197 lbs) allow him to contain opposing forwards, box out effectively, and manage space below the goal line. Statistically, his 56% puck battle win rate and 1.21 blocked shots per game speak to his commitment to team defense.
Reasons to Draft:
Smith plays within himself and maintains structure in the defensive zone. His ability to box out, protect the crease, and engage physically without overextending is notable. He averages 4.4 takeaways per game and makes smart decisions by using the walls when under pressure. He’s strong on the penalty kill and reads opposing entries well, forcing pucks to the perimeter and then sealing off the rush. Offensively, while still developing, he displays flashes of upside—capable of skating pucks through forechecks or moving it decisively with his first pass. He’s selective with his offensive touches, attempting just 1.72 shots per game but generating a respectable 33% SC% on his chances. His 6’3″ frame and growing physical assertiveness give him a foundation to build into a bottom-pairing NHL defenseman who can anchor a penalty kill and contribute in transition.
Reasons Not to Draft:
Offensive impact is limited and remains an area of concern. Smith does not generate much from the offensive blue line (0.04 pre-shot passes/game, low shot volume) and doesn’t consistently threaten as a puck mover beyond the red line. His 3.2 giveaways per game is manageable but his passing accuracy (79%) lags behind NHL projection targets. He’s not a dynamic skater or lateral mover, which restricts his recovery ability if caught up ice. His ceiling likely caps at a third-pairing or depth defender unless his decision-making, skill execution, and confidence with the puck improve in the offensive zone.
Projection:
Smith projects as a depth defenseman who can fill a penalty-killing, defensive-specialist role at the pro level. If his offensive confidence grows and his puck management sharpens, there’s potential for him to push toward a third-pairing NHL role. His size, physical play, and team-first habits give him a strong base to earn a contract and grow into a system role with development time.
Draft Recommendation:
Late Round / Priority Free Agent
Smith’s size, defensive detail, and positional discipline make him worth tracking. He has clear pro traits as a physical, defensive-minded rearguard, but limited offensive projection suggests he’s a long-term development play best suited for organizations looking to build out depth or AHL defensive support. A development path that includes multiple years in junior hockey combined with multiple years in an NCAA environment would be very beneficial.
Josh Avery (C, L, 6’0″, 171, Brantford Bulldogs, 01/30/2007)
Josh Avery is a north-south, pace-driving center who excels in transition with his skating speed. At 6’0″, 171 lbs, he’s below the average physical profile for an NHL center but compensates with explosiveness and open-ice mobility. In a limited role (12:24 TOI/game), he has demonstrated defensive reliability (0.54 SHT), faceoff competitiveness (50% FO), and offensive flashes driven by pace and effort. Avery currently serves in a middle-six role but has tools that suggest untapped upside, especially when he earns more power play time and a top-six role.
Reasons to Draft:
Avery’s top trait is his skating. He generates speed through efficient stride mechanics, allowing him to push defenders back and win footraces. His puck battles won percentage (43%) is modest but trending upward, and he draws nearly 0.20 penalties per game by forcing defenders into bad body positions. He shows good touch off the rush with 1.27 shots on goal per game and 9% SC%, which, while not elite, reflects shot quality when chances are earned. He’s also trusted defensively, seeing PK minutes and staying disciplined with low giveaway totals (3.6 GA/game) for a young, high-pace center.
Reasons Not to Draft:
Avery’s offensive production doesn’t yet match his speed or past reputation. He averages just 12:24 TOI/game and hasn’t yet carved out a consistent role on the power play (0:27 PPT). His net impact is limited by minimal zone time generation (5.15 PIA/game) and underwhelming battle wins (43%), which will need to rise against stronger competition. Without an elite shot or playmaking touch (just 0.58 SC/game and 0.38 PSP/game), his 83% passing accuracy and 0.38 PSP/game are clear indicators of playing too fast and forcing pucks into coverage, Avery must translate his raw tools into more consistent offensive outcomes for more offensive success. At his current weight (171 lbs), he will need to add strength to win more battles and protect pucks against pro-caliber defenders. He’s a work in progress whose ceiling depends on earning opportunity and physical development.
Projection:
Avery projects as a pace-driving center with penalty-kill ability and forechecking value. If his offensive game develops with more usage and improved puck play, he could challenge for a 4C/PK role at the pro level. His skating gives him a clear NHL tool, but his path depends on building more consistency and urgency with the puck.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free Agent
Avery’s north-south speed and defensive potential are NHL-aligned, but his current play and lack of production raise questions about upside. He’s a candidate for a patient, long-term development plan with value as a role-specific contributor if his strength, puck control, and confidence grow.
Carson Harmer (C, L, 5’10”, 185, Saginaw Spirit, 01/13/2007)
Carson Harmer is an undersized, high-motor two-way center who plays with energy, intelligence, and responsibility in all three zones. While he is below the average NHL center size, he competes hard and impacts the game in a variety of ways. Logging 17:24 TOI/game and contributing on both special teams (1:51 PPT, 1:31 SHT), Harmer has been used in all situations and is trusted by his coaching staff. His blend of pace, effort, and awareness makes him a difficult player to match up against at the junior level.
Reasons to Draft:
Harmer is one of the most complete 2007-born centers in terms of role versatility in the OHL. His faceoff win percentage (55%) is solid, showing reliability down the middle. Offensively, he generates 3.4 shot attempts and 2.2 shots on goal per night, producing 2.1 scoring chances per game with a respectable 15% SC%. Despite his size, he competes well in puck battles (49%) and contributes defensively with 1.92 puck retrievals and 0.47 blocked shots per game. On the PK, he’s active, disruptive, and instinctive, often transitioning defense into offense. Evaluators noted his consistent motor, willingness to work the interior, and ability to create space and turnovers with pressure.
Reasons Not to Draft:
Harmer’s size (5’9.75″) and frame (184 lbs) are below NHL norms and raise concerns about physical durability and matchup viability at the next level. While he plays bigger than his measurements he will need to continue to develop strength, power and explosiveness for long term success in the National League. His offensive toolkit—while productive at the OHL level—lacks standout traits; he’s not an elite shooter (only 0.59 blocked shots and 0.62 missed shots/game), nor a high-end playmaker in tight spaces as his 84% passing rate is slightly below average, 0.66 pre-shot passes per game are simply not enough to warrant top-six potential in the NHL. His puck losses (4.9 GA/game) remain on the high side for a possession-driven forward — he can be forced into errors under pressure.
Projection:
Harmer projects as a bottom-six forward who can kill penalties, win faceoffs, push pace, and provide consistent energy. If he continues to develop physically and improves his offensive execution against stronger competition, there’s potential for him to become a reliable depth option at the pro level. His ceiling will depend on whether he can add strength and continue to handle bigger, faster opponents without sacrificing his pace or compete level.
Draft Recommendation:
Late Round Consideration / Priority Free Agent
Harmer’s motor, intelligence, and versatility are clear NHL-aligned attributes. He has the tools to carve out a role as a responsible bottom-six forward with face-off ability, PK specialist, and energy player. While he lacks size and elite offensive skill, he plays a winning brand of hockey that organizations value in later-round picks. Continued development physically and offensively will be key to maximizing his pro potential.
Lukas Sawchyn (C, R, 5’10”, 168, Edmonton Oil Kings, 02/27/2007)
Lukas Sawchyn is an undersized, highly skilled winger with a dynamic offensive toolset centered around speed, agility, and puck control. Averaging 16:07 TOI per game with a significant 3:06 of power play usage, Sawchyn plays a top-six scoring role and is deployed in high-leverage offensive situations. Despite his size (below WHL and NHL positional averages), his skating and puck skill allow him to drive transition and create offensive zone entries with consistency.
Reasons to Draft:
Sawchyn possesses legitimate offensive upside. He generates 3.8 shot attempts and 2.1 shots on goal per game, while producing nearly 2 scoring chances per game with a respectable 10% shot conversion percentage (SC%). His speed and quick-strike agility make him difficult to contain off the rush, especially when he uses linear attacks to pull defenders wide before cutting back inside. His 3.3 takeaways/game, and 1.04 pre-shot passes per game highlight his creativity and vision in possession. Sawchyn’s ability to manipulate defenders in tight space and delay under pressure to make plays shows strong processing and poise. He also competes to extend possession, registering 12 puck battles per game and winning 47% of them despite a smaller frame. He uses his skating to win races to pucks and beat defenders to loose pucks in all three zones.
Reasons Not to Draft:
At 5’9.75″ and 168 lbs, Sawchyn is significantly undersized for a winger at the NHL level and lacks the frame to absorb contact consistently at higher levels of competition. He receives 0.79 hits per game and has difficulty creating separation with physical strength rather than speed. His 5.3 giveaways per game and 85% pass completion percentage are areas for concern for an offensive minded wing — in the WHL there is risk with puck security when he is challenged physically so how will he handle National League defenders? While his skating is very good, he is not an elite burner, and his acceleration—while effective at the junior level—may not be as impactful against NHL defenders with longer reach and greater speed. He is not used on the penalty kill, and his defensive zone time is limited, which speaks to his role being heavily weighted toward offense-only usage.
Projection:
Sawchyn projects as a scoring winger with power play upside if his speed and playmaking translate. His path through professional hockey will depend on adding functional strength and improving his ability to handle contact and pressure from pro-level defenders. His agility, offensive IQ, and puck skill give him a chance to be an offensive driver on a scoring line if paired with more size or defensive support.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free Agent
Sawchyn brings pace, vision, and creativity from the wing that are difficult to teach. His skating and puck skills are pro-caliber, but the physical limitations and puck management concerns could limit his ceiling. If he continues to develop physically and refines his puck decisions under pressure, he has the offensive instincts to grow into an NHL winger in the right environment.
Jack Fichthorn (G, L, 6’0″, 173, Westminster, 05/10/2007)
Jack Fichthorn is an athletic, highly competitive goaltender who logged 28 starts this season for Westminster, posting a .923 save percentage with 15 wins and a strong 3.6 saves on expected goals. He faced a high volume of quality chances (16 scoring area saves/game) and responded with poise, positioning, and quickness. While he is currently below the NHL average in both height (6’3″) and weight (200–225 lbs), Fichthorn makes up for size limitations with elite reaction time, technical soundness, and compete level.
Reasons to Draft:
Fichthorn consistently displays high-end tracking ability and calmness under pressure, rarely losing sight of the puck through traffic or scrambles. He plays with a squared stance, controls depth well, and manages his crease with purpose—shuffling efficiently to stay on angle and balanced. His glove hand is a strength and his post-to-post movement is clean. His 0.871 saves on expected goals reflects his ability to outperform baseline metrics and manage high-danger situations. He handles second and third chances effectively, limiting rebounds and tying up pucks when his team breaks down defensively. His showing at Flood Marr and USA Camp underscored his quick reads and competitiveness, notably performing well under sustained pressure and in high-leverage moments. Neutral Zone evaluators noted his ability to rise above the group at National Camp, showing readiness and calm in All-Star-level competition.
Reasons Not to Draft:
Fichthorn’s biggest challenge moving forward is his physical profile. At 6’0″, 173 lbs, he is undersized by modern NHL goaltending standards and may face challenges covering the upper portions of the net at the pro level. While his angles are strong and his technical habits are sharp, he does not have the natural net coverage afforded to larger goaltenders. His ability to maintain peak performance against consistently larger, faster shooters at higher levels remains a question. He will need to continue to add strength and maintain his agility to withstand the physical demands of the position as he advances.
Projection:
Fichthorn projects as a long-term development goaltender with NCAA starter potential and pro upside if his frame can continue to mature. His skating, vision, and ability to track the puck through traffic are NHL-level traits. He fits best in an organization that values structure and patience in goalie development. With time, he could evolve into a reliable AHL starter with NHL backup potential depending on how well he handles size disadvantages at higher levels.
Draft Recommendation:
Priority Free Agent
Fichthorn’s performance metrics and mental makeup support investment, particularly in a college free agent situation. While his size may dissuade some clubs, his compete level, quickness, and high-end tracking ability offer developmental value. He’s earned the opportunity to be tracked closely and potentially invited to an NHL development camp setting where his adaptability and composure can continue to be evaluated.
Photo credit: Dan Hickling/Hickling Images