Tomas Mikel (D, R, 6’4″, 184, Cedar Rapids RoughRiders, 04/23/2007, UMass Amherst)
Tomas Mikel is a long, projectable right-shot defenseman who shows flashes of defensive reliability but remains very raw in terms of overall polish and impact. At 6’4″, Mikel owns an NHL frame and understands how to use his reach and leverage in defensive zone coverage. His battle winning percentage (57%) and puck anticipation (1.03 loose puck recoveries per game) stand out positively. However, his current lack of offensive contribution, limited physicality despite his size, and below-average puck moving skills raise significant concerns about his NHL upside without substantial further development.
Why Mikel Should Be Drafted
1) NHL Size and Defensive Foundation
At 6’4″ and 184 pounds, Mikel brings natural reach and a frame that can be built upon. His defensive game shows early structure: good angles, patient gap control, and a willingness to block shots (0.79 per game), which are non-negotiables for bottom-pairing NHL defensemen.
2) High Defensive Battle Success Rate
Winning 57% of his puck battles against older USHL competition and international opponents at the U18 level highlights that he can use his frame and strength effectively. He doesn’t shy away from contact in battles, even if he’s not overly punishing.
3) Puck Management Maturity
Mikel plays a low-risk style with the puck, evidenced by strong puck recovery numbers (4.5 puck retrievals per game) and low giveaway totals (4.1 GA per game, very good for his usage). He understands his limitations and rarely puts himself or his team in danger with poor decisions.
4) Willing Shot Blocker
Demonstrates commitment to defensive detail with a consistently strong willingness to get in shooting lanes and sacrifice his body.
Why Mikel May Not Be Drafted
1) Limited Offensive Tools
Offensively, Mikel is nearly non-existent. His Cedar Rapids numbers — 0 goals, 1 assist in 16 games — are consistent with low passing creativity (0.38 pre-shot passes per game) and little to no activation into the rush. His passing accuracy (84%) is functional but lacks deception, creativity, or progression-driving ability.
2) Passive Physicality
Despite his frame, Mikel averaged only 0.59 hits per game, far below what is needed for a player with his size. He is too reliant on stick checks and body positioning without bringing an intimidation element, which will be required at the pro level.
3) Average Skating Mobility
Although mobile enough for junior hockey, Mikel’s skating — especially agility and lateral foot speed — will need improvement. His game is built more around anticipation than recovery, and at faster levels, his current footwork could be exposed.
4) No Current Threat to Impact Transition
At the next level, defenders must not only defend but also contribute to puck movement. Mikel’s poor breakout passing and lack of controlled zone exits could limit his usefulness even in a sheltered defensive role unless this area improves significantly.
Projection & Recommendation
Projection: Defensive #6/7 NHL defenseman if physical play, first-pass execution, and footspeed improve.
Development Track: 4 years minimum — 2 additional years in the USHL, 2+ years of NCAA development and 2+ years of minor league development before.
Draft Range: Late 7th Round
Verdict: Mikel is a draftable long-term project due to his frame, defensive instincts, and competitiveness in his own zone. However, his passive game and lack of intimidation need to be addressed through targeted development. He is not an impact pick but could provide organizational depth on defense if his skating and physical assertiveness take a step forward in the next two to three years. Selecting him would require a long view toward patient development and strength building.